Justices can’t win on matters of their personal faith

Americans seem to prefer ‘religious lite’

By

Editorials

April 19, 2022 - 3:28 PM

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Photo by (Tom Williams/Pool/Getty Images/TNS)

On a scale of 1 to 10, how faithful would you say you are, in terms of religion?” If you were a Supreme Court nominee and this question were posed to you in public by a senator, as it was to Ketanji Brown Jackson last month, how would you answer?

In American civil religion, it is good to be faithful, but not too faithful. It is good to have religion, but not to have any specific beliefs that might get in the way of your ability to make good judgments. Belief is the answer to everything and has purpose for nothing. It is fundamentally necessary and, at the same time, untrustworthy.

In the theater in which civil religion is performed, some people probe others in an attempt to reveal if there is anything unusual about their religion. It can feel like theater of the absurd.

Related
March 3, 2022
February 25, 2022
April 15, 2020
April 10, 2020