TOPEKA, Kansas — Kansas lawmakers have continued to pass on a federal policy that could make more people eligible for food assistance programs. Now, the state is one of the last in the country that has not yet adopted it.
The policy has to do with how much value people can have in assets and still receive food stamps. The flexibility allows families to have more assets and still be eligible for food assistance, something that especially benefits older people or families caring for elderly relatives.
So far, 41 states, two territories and the District of Columbia have adopted the more flexible rules, including conservative states like Texas, Florida and Alabama. Those states have even raised the minimum thresholds for eligibility as part of the program.
Adopting the policy — called broad-based categorical eligibility — would not mean that more people automatically get food assistance. It simply allows states to expand federal guidelines to make more people eligible. Those people would still go through the application process and could be denied.
Current federal policy cuts off benefits to anyone making too much. That’s $1,133 in monthly net income for a household of one or $1,920 for a household of three.
In addition to income limits, people are ineligible for food stamps if they have $2,750 in assets — such as money in savings accounts or the value of cars — or up to $4,250 in assets if at least one person in the household is over 60 or disabled. Dozens of states have waived asset limits and have almost doubled income thresholds because of categorical eligibility.
Haley Kottler, a food policy expert with Kansas Appleseed, said making it harder to get food assistance can have negative affects on families in other ways. A 2017 study from the University of Kansas found that welfare cuts increased the number of foster care cases. A later study further confirmed that expanding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program could decrease the number of foster care cases.
Kottler said asset limits can be especially harmful because it penalizes people for having savings needed for the “curveballs that life often throws at us — car repairs, home repairs, unexpected job loss and family funerals, just to name a few.”
“It is extremely disappointing that state lawmakers have continued to villainize and stigmatize our neighbors that need access to programs like food assistance the most,” she said in an email. “So often Kansas is lagging behind other states when it comes to helping hungry people access food.”
Kansas lawmakers appear unlikely to make it easier to access SNAP. The state has only added on more requirements to get food assistance, like expanding age ranges for work requirements and increasing the minimum number of hours someone has to work.
The state also set up a welfare reform committee to continue to look at changes. Francis Awerkamp, the Republican chair of that committee, didn’t respond to requests for comment about what lawmakers want to do when they return to Topeka in January.
Republicans have said those changes incentivize more people to get jobs and help lift them out of poverty. In 2016, when Kansas passed the HOPE Act, a wide-ranging bill with a host of restrictions on welfare programs, then-Republican governor Sam Brownback said this would be good for low-income people.
“It’s helped people get out of poverty. It’s helped people have more income and in some cases it’s helped people get back their dignity to get back into the labor force,” Brownback said in 2016.
Gina Plata-Nino, deputy director for SNAP at the Food Research and Action Center, looks at SNAP policies across the country. She didn’t have glowing reviews of the Kansas program.
She said expanding eligibility has been a positive thing for other states. Not only does it make programs more flexible for users, but it reduces the administrative burdens on states.
