Emmanuel Macron’s troubled second presidential term was already set to go down as one of the most turbulent in the history of France’s Fifth Republic.
A succession of prime ministers have come and gone at dizzying speed. A snap election last July, foolishly called by Mr. Macron in the hope of seeing off Marine Le Pen’s far right National Rally (RN), almost catapulted it into power.
None of that drama, however, remotely rivaled the coup de theatre delivered on Monday in a courtroom rather than a voting booth when Le Pen, her party, the National Rally, and 24 codefendants were charged with misappropriating funds from the European Parliament from November 2004 to January 2016.
The court estimated the National Rally embezzled almost $5 million, of which Le Pen masterminded first as a member of the European Parliament and then later as party president.
The funds had been earmarked for assistants helping lawmakers in the European Parliament with their work. Instead, judges said, Le Pen and her lawmakers used the money to fuel its domestic rise between 2004 and 2016 by paying party staffers who weren’t involved in work for the parliament, violating the 27-nation bloc’s regulations.
The decision by Paris judges to bar Ms. Le Pen from standing for office for five years has spectacularly shaken up a political landscape dominated by the far-right threat.
Ahead of presidential elections in 2027 — in which Mr. Macron cannot run — Ms. Le Pen had become the candidate to beat, using her experience to exploit deepening discontent with the political mainstream.
In a genuine bombshell moment, it now seems likely that a replacement — probably her youthful protege, Jordan Bardella, who is yet to turn 30 — will be obliged to step in.
At a time when the rule of law is being undermined by populist leaders who view an independent judiciary as a threat — Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, the Kremlin, U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and tech billionaire Elon Musk have all described the verdict as an act of the “radical left” — the judges’ verdict has drawn a necessary and salutary line in the sand.
Although she will appeal against the ban, Ms. Le Pen was caught bang to rights.
A fake jobs system, with Ms. Le Pen at its heart, facilitated embezzlement on an industrial scale. Beginning after her election as an MEP and continuing once she became party leader, it merited exemplary punishment.
The political consequences of the court decision, although undoubtedly seismic, are harder to read. The fines imposed on the RN will do serious damage to its finances and ability to campaign.
But inevitably, a martyrdom narrative will now be deployed to bolster the far right’s anti-establishment credentials. In the immediate aftermath of Ms. Le Pen’s ban, Mr. Bardella duly lamented that French democracy had been “executed” by an “unjust” verdict. Amid assorted messages of far-right solidarity, Musk was predictably to the fore, echoing the same theme.
Among sections of an electorate that already take a highly jaundiced view of governing elites, playing the victim could produce political dividends.
But those charged with delivering justice in liberal democracies cannot be concerned with such calculations. The current level of Ms. Le Pen’s political support does not place her above the law, nor was it appropriate for it to play any part in the reasoning of the judges.
A leader willing to facilitate systematic corruption in political processes for more than a decade deserves to forfeit the right to seek the honour of her country’s highest office.
