We’re teaching the Holocaust all wrong

The Nazis cast their violence as self-defense. Once a society accepts that its survival depends on eradicating an omnipresent enemy, the step from paranoia to persecution becomes automatic.

By

Columnists

November 20, 2025 - 2:02 PM

German dictator and head of the Nazi party, Adolf Hitler delivers his May Day address at Lustgarten in Berlin, May 1, 1936. On the left is Joseph Goebbels. Hitler was a master of weaponizing fear — of Jews, of a Communist uprising, of dark-skinned races — to get people to believe only he and his determination to expel these “outcasts,” was their salvation. (Topical Press Agency/Hulton Archive/Getty Images/TNS)

“First they came for the Jews.” Many Americans remember that line as the beginning of a confession, offered in 1946 by Martin Niemoller and taught to schoolchildren ever since. First they came for the Jews, then they came for the Communists and the trade unionists; when they finally came for him, he said, “there was no one left to speak for me.”

In its simple and steady progression, it is a powerful illustration of the consequences of apathy. But it is a distortion. In Niemoeller’s original version, the Nazis first came for the Communists, as indeed they did.

The distinction is more than a historical detail. It’s a key to how a ruthlessly effective movement succeeded. The Nazis vilified Jews not just as a race but as the supposed masterminds of Communism, or “Judeo-Bolshevism,” a twin enemy that was  external and internal all at once. The Nazis cast their violence as pre-emptive self-defense.

That’s the authoritarian playbook: Promise safety through vigilance, unity through fear; describe aggression as preservation. 

Senator Joseph McCarthy did it when he turned the Cold War into a hunt for invisible enemies at home. Vladimir Putin does it when he brands dissenters as foreign agents. Donald Trump does it when he says that America is under attack “from within” and immigrants are a poison in the nation’s blood.

From the moment they emerged as a movement, the Nazis exploited Germans’ fear of a civil war, which was, above all, the fear of a Communist uprising. That fear swept the Nazis into power in January 1933 and gave them license to crack down on the political left, imprisoning more than 100,000 German political opponents, most of whom were Communists. 

On the strength of this fear, a majority of the remaining deputies in the German parliament passed the Enabling Act, granting Hitler’s cabinet power to legislate without parliamentary interference.

Just days after taking office, Hitler met with top German military leaders. Many arrived regarding the new chancellor as a grandstanding upstart. By evening’s end, after a two-and-a-half-hour speech promising to “completely annihilate” the political left and restore the army’s pre-eminence, he had won many of the military leaders over. The fear of internal subversion became the foundation of national unity.

Niemoller, a Lutheran pastor, enthusiastically backed Hitler at that time, believing that the Führer would restore health and greatness to Germany. Only in subsequent years did Niemoeller grasp Nazism’s oppressive nature and speak out against it. He was arrested in 1937 and was imprisoned for the next eight years.

Meanwhile, Hitler’s government stepped up its campaign against Judeo-Bolshevism, depicting the Soviet Union as the world’s most powerful Jewish organization — “World Enemy No. 1.” Large “anti-Bolshevik” exhibitions toured German cities during the 1930s, to expose the Kremlin’s Semitic face and deadly designs. Hundreds of thousands of German boys and men saw these ghastly shows before joining their nation’s war.

The Eastern Front, often presented as a later chapter in the history of the Holocaust, was in fact its ultimate expression. Launched in June 1941, it was the largest invasion in human history, a genocidal war to annihilate a political order, a culture and a people. 

Even after the defeat at Stalingrad, when the Red Army advanced westward, the Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels warned of the “Jewish death squads” following the Soviet divisions, a threat that bound Germans together more powerfully than any promise of victory.

That emotional economy — the transformation of fear into cohesion — is both the origin of the authoritarian impulse and its creation. Once a society accepts that its survival depends on eradicating an omnipresent enemy, the step from paranoia to persecution becomes automatic.

Sen. Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin repeatedly told the public they should be fearful of subversive Communist influence in their lives. This paranoia about the internal Communist threat — the Red Scare — reached a fever pitch between 1950 and 1954, when McCarthy launched a series of highly publicized probes into alleged Communist penetration of the State Department, the White House, the Treasury, and even the US Army. During President Eisenhower’s first two years in office, McCarthy’s shrieking denunciations and fear-mongering created a climate of fear and suspicion across the country. No one dared tangle with McCarthy for fear of being labeled disloyal. (Wisconsin Historical Society/TNS)

In the postwar United States, McCarthyism echoed this logic, albeit on a less catastrophic scale. 

With the Communist Soviet Union as a distant enemy, Senator Joseph McCarthy persuaded Americans that the true threat lurked in Washington, Hollywood and the universities. The Cold War’s geopolitical anxiety was turned inward, into a national inquisition that equated dissent with disloyalty. Public hearings and blacklists became instruments of purification. 

McCarthy’s anti-Communist witch hunt rendered fear into the glue of national cohesion.

Related
October 2, 2024
June 11, 2021
April 7, 2021
December 12, 2019