Since the beginning, our founders have been clear: freedom of the press means the freedom to say things the government doesn’t like
Press tents are seen outside of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, Sept. 21, 2026. Three leading U.S. news outlets announced on Sept. 21 they will go to court after being banned from the White House, as President Donald Trump claimed that media critical of his administration is a “Cancer” threatening national security. (Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)
Since the beginning, our founders have been clear: freedom of the press means the freedom to say things the government doesn’t like
Twice during President Trump’s first term, his administration tried to prevent a journalist whose work it did not like from reporting at the White House. Twice, judges rejected the moves as unconstitutional and restored the journalists’ access. Now the administration is attempting the same move, barring journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House because they had written what the president called “purposefully negative stories.”
The new ban is alarming for two reasons: It continues both Mr. Trump’s attempt to prevent the free flow of information in American society and his utter disregard of the law.
In his first term, trial courts and an appeals court issued clear rulings blocking the very policy he has again implemented. He has gone ahead anyway, much as he and his aides have flagrantly broken the law across multiple areas during his second term. The administration ignored an order to halt planes carrying deportees to El Salvador; violated nearly 100 court orders during an immigration crackdown in Minnesota; went to war in Iran and impounded funds without congressional approval; used federal power to corruptly enrich Mr. Trump and his allies; and much more.
The Iola Register needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary. Comments are moderated for civility. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.